According to the source, Ardoino stated that Bitcoin and Gold will outlast any other currency, source: provided content. The statement is a sentiment comment favoring a hard-asset, store-of-value narrative and contains no price targets, timeframes, or supporting market/on-chain data, source: provided content. No details on BTC or XAU price impact, trading levels, or catalysts were provided, so any trading decisions should rely on independent market data and risk controls, source: provided content.

According to the source, in 2015 an iPhone cost 4 BTC, while in 2025 one BTC buys 122 iPhones, highlighting a dramatic shift in BTC’s real-goods purchasing power that traders can benchmark over cycles for momentum signals, source: X post dated Oct 5, 2025. Using Apple U.S. MSRP of $649 for the iPhone 6s in 2015 and $799 for the current base iPhone, that ratio implies BTC rose from roughly $162 per coin to about $97,478 and delivered a 488x gain in iPhone-denominated purchasing power, source: Apple Inc. product pricing archives and calculation based on the source post. This long-horizon outperformance versus a stable consumer electronics basket reinforces BTC’s fixed-supply, store-of-value narrative that often coincides with bull-phase liquidity expansion, a context traders can incorporate into position sizing and trend-following frameworks, source: Bitcoin.org consensus and halving schedule documentation. To validate ongoing demand, traders should monitor BTC/USD trend and spot Bitcoin ETF primary market net creations/redemptions as reported by issuers and filings, source: issuer flow reports and U.S. SEC fund filings.

According to the source, in 2015 an iPhone cost 4 BTC, and now 1 BTC buys 122 iPhones, indicating a sharp shift in BTC purchasing power relative to consumer electronics (source: user-provided social media post dated Oct 5, 2025). Based on those figures, BTC’s iPhone-denominated purchasing power rose by about 488x since 2015, with an implied ~86% CAGR over roughly 10 years, calculated as 122/0.25 and (488)^(1/10)-1 respectively (source: same post). For traders, the data supports the long-term store-of-value narrative and may bolster BTC dip-buying sentiment, but the post does not specify iPhone model or USD pricing, so it does not provide an immediate price target or trade setup (source: same post).

According to @ItsDave_ADA, institutions are allocating billions to digital assets without fixed supply caps, leading to continuous supply growth he equates with fiat-style debasement. source: @ItsDave_ADA He argues a hard supply cap is essential to the sound money and store-of-value thesis and cites Bitcoin BTC and Cardano ADA as hard-capped examples. source: @ItsDave_ADA For trading, investors who align with this view may tilt toward capped-supply assets like BTC and ADA and track relative strength and flows versus inflationary tokens when the store-of-value narrative dominates. source: @ItsDave_ADA Risk note: this supply-driven framework differs from strategies that prioritize utility or yield, so allocation decisions should explicitly reflect the hard-cap thesis. source: @ItsDave_ADA

According to @ItsDave_ADA, ADA is sound digital money and a store of value like BTC, stated in an X post dated Sep 27, 2025 (source: @ItsDave_ADA on X). The source advances a store-of-value narrative for ADA but provides no corroborating market evidence such as price action, volume, or on-chain metrics for validation (source: @ItsDave_ADA on X). From a trading perspective, this should be classified as opinion-driven sentiment rather than a data-backed catalyst until supported by independent metrics or disclosures (source: @ItsDave_ADA on X).

According to @borgetsebastien, BTC is increasingly treated as a store of value and social status rather than a spendable currency, a dynamic that suppresses BTC transaction velocity and pushes everyday utility to altcoin rails; source: @borgetsebastien, X, Sep 7, 2025. He stated that altcoins are needed to power fluid economies across apps, chains, and services, especially for digital ownership, art, and gaming items, implying transactional demand may concentrate in altcoin ecosystems; source: @borgetsebastien, X, Sep 7, 2025. For trading, this narrative supports monitoring BTC dominance versus altcoin volume rotations, with Web3 gaming and digital collectibles tokens as potential beneficiaries during risk-on phases; analysis grounded in source: @borgetsebastien, X, Sep 7, 2025. Traders can track flows into cross-chain infrastructure and application-layer tokens while using conservative sizing to account for higher volatility relative to BTC; analysis grounded in source: @borgetsebastien, X, Sep 7, 2025. These insights were shared during a packed Bitcoin Asia 2025 panel featuring industry leaders, signaling broader alignment on BTC as a reserve asset and altcoins as the utility layer; source: @borgetsebastien, X, Sep 7, 2025.

According to @Andre_Dragosch, Bitcoin (BTC) is demonetizing other stores of value, including real estate, when assets are priced in BTC. Source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Sep 3, 2025. The post emphasizes a BTC-denominated lens, implying non-BTC assets underperform when measured in BTC, per the author’s framing. Source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Sep 3, 2025. For traders, this supports prioritizing BTC exposure and tracking cross-asset performance in BTC terms to inform allocation and relative-value positioning. Source: @Andre_Dragosch on X, Sep 3, 2025.

According to @wallisi, a link to a piece titled The case for Bitcoin and Gold was shared on X on September 2, 2025, signaling an analysis focused on Bitcoin BTC and gold as assets (source: X post by @wallisi on September 2, 2025). The post did not provide quantitative data, allocation targets, backtests, or trading metrics, so no verified performance, risk, or correlation figures can be drawn from the post itself (source: X post by @wallisi on September 2, 2025).

According to Dan Held, Bitcoin payments did very little to drive adoption, with 99% of adoption over the last 15 years coming from store-of-value speculation; source: Dan Held on X, Aug 29, 2025. According to Dan Held, traders should prioritize signals tied to speculative demand and the store-of-value narrative over payment usage metrics when assessing BTC; source: Dan Held on X, Aug 29, 2025.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, @avichal of Electric Capital states that BTC is a store of value and ETH is where the future of global capital markets will be based, source: @MilkRoadDaily. This frames a trading thesis that separates BTC as digital store-of-value exposure and ETH as the programmable base layer for capital markets infrastructure, source: @MilkRoadDaily. Allocation decisions following this thesis would treat BTC as macro SoV exposure and ETH as growth and utility exposure tied to tokenized assets and on-chain finance, as characterized by the source, source: @MilkRoadDaily.

According to @MilkRoadDaily, BTC is positioned as a store of value and ETH as the future base layer for global capital markets in a post dated Aug 13, 2025, referencing Avichal and Electric Capital as the thesis source (Milk Road, X post, Aug 13, 2025). The source provides no quantitative data, price levels, or catalysts, indicating this is sentiment-oriented commentary rather than an actionable trading signal (Milk Road, X post, Aug 13, 2025).

According to @ItsDave_ADA, Cardano’s fixed supply of 45 billion ADA mirrors Bitcoin’s programmatic scarcity and underpins a long-term store-of-value thesis, which frames a scarcity-driven investment approach for ADA exposure, source: @ItsDave_ADA on X August 10 2025. Cardano’s protocol defines a hard cap of 45 billion ADA with declining monetary expansion from reserves, making total issuance capped and predictable for supply analysis, source: Input Output Global documentation on Cardano monetary policy. Bitcoin’s supply is capped at 21 million with block reward halvings every 210000 blocks, establishing programmatic scarcity that traders benchmark for cyclical positioning, source: Bitcoin.org developer documentation on controlled supply. On Cardano, transaction fees and monetary expansion accrue to a rewards pot distributed to stake pool operators delegators and the treasury, and the protocol does not implement a native fee burn, shaping circulating supply dynamics and staking yields, source: Input Output Global Cardano Ledger documentation. For trade execution and risk management around the scarcity narrative, circulating supply and staking participation can be monitored via the official Cardano Foundation explorer to assess liquid float and potential sell pressure, source: Cardano Foundation explorer.

According to @alice_und_bob, ETH is heavily used in on-chain economic activity, supporting its roles as medium of exchange, unit of account, and store of value, highlighting real transactional demand for ETH that traders track through network usage signals, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 9, 2025. The author also questions the sustainability of ETH continuing to fulfill these monetary functions, underscoring a key consideration for market participants evaluating Ethereum’s demand dynamics, source: @alice_und_bob on X, Aug 9, 2025.

According to @BitMEXResearch, the current debate among those seeking superior forms of money centers on whether to add zeros, not slash them, reflecting ongoing confidence in Bitcoin's (BTC) value proposition as an inflation hedge and store of value. This narrative reinforces bullish sentiment among traders, as it frames BTC as a potential solution to fiat currency devaluation, fueling positive momentum and potentially increasing demand in crypto markets (source: @BitMEXResearch).

According to @ItsDave_ADA, there is an increasing focus on how Cardano's programmability can enhance Bitcoin's application in real-world finance. The analysis highlights that Bitcoin (BTC) serves its primary function as a decentralized store of value, intentionally designed with minimalism to prioritize security and auditability, as stated by the source. This perspective suggests that Cardano (ADA) could provide a layer of programmability on top of Bitcoin, potentially unlocking new financial use cases for BTC without altering its core secure base, which could impact the valuation and trading dynamics of both assets.

According to Michael Saylor, Bitcoin (BTC) will not absorb investment capital from all asset classes. He clarifies that Bitcoin functions as a unique capital asset and a store of value, primarily competing with other store-of-value assets like gold, real estate, and long-duration bonds, not with cash-flow generating equities or transactional currencies. Saylor argues that the flow of capital into Bitcoin represents a multi-trillion dollar reallocation from underperforming or inflationary assets within the store-of-value category. For traders, this perspective frames Bitcoin's growth as a fundamental shift away from traditional safe-haven assets rather than a threat to the entire stock market, suggesting a long-term bullish thesis based on capturing the market share of assets like gold.

According to Nic Carter, a shared chart illustrates that Bitcoin's (BTC) monetary inflation rate has fallen to approximately 0.85% following the fourth halving event. The data presented shows this new issuance rate is now significantly lower than that of gold, which has a historical inflation rate of about 1.5%. For traders, this reinforces Bitcoin's core value proposition as a scarce, 'hard' asset. The systematic reduction in new supply with each halving event, as shown in the chart, is a fundamental factor supporting a long-term bullish outlook on BTC's price by tightening its supply dynamics relative to traditional stores of value.

According to Cas Abbé on Twitter, the fundamental debate between Bitcoin and gold centers on the notion of 'real value.' While critics argue that Bitcoin is just code, Abbé points out that digital systems, including bank balances and the internet, also rely on code and electricity. For traders, this underscores Bitcoin’s legitimacy as a store of value comparable to gold. This perspective can influence investor sentiment and support bullish trends for BTC, especially as digital asset adoption grows and traditional gold markets show stability. Source: @cas_abbe on Twitter.

According to Milk Road (@MilkRoadDaily), Bitcoin ($BTC) continues to be primarily used as a vehicle for wealth generation rather than for everyday utility. This perspective underscores Bitcoin’s ongoing role as a leading store of value in the crypto market and highlights its dominance in trading strategies focused on capital appreciation. Traders may interpret this as a reaffirmation of Bitcoin’s position as a core portfolio asset, with potential implications for altcoin rotation and risk-on sentiment across crypto markets. Source: Milk Road Twitter, June 17, 2025.

According to Dan Held (@danheld), Bitcoin will replace gold as the leading store of value asset, stating, 'It's not a matter of if, but when' (source: Twitter, June 17, 2025). This assertion reflects a growing sentiment among institutional and retail investors that BTC may surpass gold in market capitalization and adoption due to its digital scarcity and ease of transfer. Traders should monitor Bitcoin's price correlation with gold, as increased BTC inflows from gold ETF outflows could accelerate volatility and trading opportunities in the cryptocurrency market. This trend may also boost demand for BTC-based financial products, affecting both spot and derivatives trading.